he Wife of Bath, The Miller and The Pardoner Essay Example for Free

he Wife of Bath, The Miller and The Pard acer EssayThe fact that he has a verruca on his nose makes him seem an ugly person and this is reflected in his personality and the type of story he is likely to tell. He also has a mouth which is described as a greet forneys. This is to request that he is a irregular of a gossip and full of hot air. It may also be indicative of the hellish language that he uses as a fire is utilize to heat a furnace and hell is linked to fire. This type of person would ca-ca probably been around quite a bit in Chaucers time in the taverns and inns.He may kick in seen a hardly a(prenominal) going habitation in the early hours of the morning and heard them telling rude jokes ad stories at the top of their voices. This would have given him the perfect frame for the Miller as most would have been big burley men. The fact he is described as being so ugly may be partly the view that Chaucer has near milling machines in general and also establish on t hose people that would have been lying drunken in the street.The Miller has a thombe of gold which makes sense as there would only have been one miller to each village which would mean they could charge what they liked for the flour they made because the people would be passing unlikely and unwilling to go to another village in companionship to try and get a cheaper price. This therefore makes him seem more realistic and less imagined because Chaucer may have been talking to the highest degree the one in London and using ugly features of others to make the miller appear ugly. He could have through with(p) this as a way of partial revenge to the miller for charging so lots.The pardoner is described in the most grotesque fashion of all three characters. He has heer as yelow as wex. This is a especially nasty way of describing slightlyone that it makes the reader really able to envisage what it looks like. Therefore Chaucer must have ground this on somebody that he had seen beca use otherwise he would not thought to have used such(prenominal) an unusual simile. Chaucer goes on to say I trowe he were a gelding or a mare. This is possibly one of the greatest insults in the English language and hence supports the view that he based his characters on real people.Chaucer clearly dislikes the Pardoner otherwise he would not have written about him in such a manner. Chaucer uses irony to describe him because the Pardoner is carrying around fake relics and selling them to silly priests for a months wages. This is against everything that the church and bible stand for. In my opinion Chaucer was using this as a fable for his views on the religious system. This is because most of the church at that time had at least a few corrupt members and this was mainly true of the ministers at Rome.Nearer the end of his description Chaucer is seemingly in wonder of the pardoner at how well he is able to tell stories and sing. This is because he finds it so amazing that such a dishonest man can stand in a church and praise deity and sell pardons which are essentially sinful in themselves as no one has the power to exempt except for God. This type of person may very well have been met by Chaucer at some point in his life and his utter disgust at the man stayed with him forever. This would undoubtedly influenced his decision as to make the pardoner the most disgusting and unscrupulous members of the pilgrimage.In conclusion I believe that Chaucer based his characters on real people as the descriptions are in such depth that it is hard to deliberate he could have just made them up. On the other hand as a parable writer he has to be very creative and would want his audience to believe the characters as much as possible. I am of the opinion that no one can imagine something completely newly that they have never seen before or at least something close to it in nature or appearance.Therefore even if his attentions were to create complete characters of fictio n subconsciously he would have based them on people that he may have seen walking past him in the street. This is unlikely as I feel he would have closely observed different groups and their attitudes very closely in order to get the right appearance and personality that he wanted for his characters.